Is faith sufficient by itself or is obeying the law a necessary component?
Evangelicals make their doctrine of Christ distinct from all others by claiming that we are made righteous in His sight by faith that is alone, stipulating a faith that is the forerunner of good works, as in, faith is the kind which is a foundation for righteous deeds naturally coming about as byproduct.
The question I want to ask, though, is this: do evangelicals also believe that creating a life which reflects the righteousness Christ modeled (sanctification) is indeed created by faith + obedience, or is it too, created by faith alone; a faith that is apart from (or rather before) obedience?
Once again, the sanctifying faith we are talking of is the kind which ignites foundation for naturally obedient living as a byproduct.
Is the byproduct -- that obedience -- a necessary component to holiness?
We had to cut the discussion short last night, so it's still out what Ben means when he says, "Yes, faith and obedience are necessary for sanctification."
As for Jeff, this is what he said to me: "I'm a James chapter two kind of guy. I think we are fruit inspectors and it's fine if people say they have faith, but, when they do that, I want to see them back it up. Sanctification [pausing to think]... is faith and obedience."
It is my assertion that, as far as I understand it, the model of righteousness in salvation is identical to the model of righteousness in sanctification: we are told over and over again, hold to the teachings you have heard from the beginning. The message doesn't change once we get in the door. It was Christ by faith then, it still is and always will be, Christ by faith alone. Paul wasn't fighting the Judiazers moreso for salvation's model, it was equally insisting for the preservation of the model of sanctification. Jesus is the only way to the Father both as the door and as the path to walk in all the days of our life.
The answer is critically pragmatic; we warn incessantly about the false churches and their doctrines of faith in Jesus combined with some arrangement of law (deeds proving faith). Paul warned us about this teaching, calling it false. If this is the case, shouldn't we be ever so protective not to stray into suggestions of faith + obedience as requirement of growth in Christ?
Ramifications: if so many of us are naively, ignorantly falling into the same form of applied belief as everyone else is choosing by design, can we really be so confident about how our church has it all figured out?
Thursday, November 29, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I believe that you meant to say "if so many of us are naively, ignorantly falling into the same form of belief as everyone else is choosing as led by the Holy Spirit, we should be confident that our church has it figured out."
Of course you could say that christians "naively, ignorantly fall into the same form of belief" that Jesus is Lord. I think it's called faith..
Hmm: When I say "falling into this applied belief" I am referring to the one where we believe that works bring sanctification. If works do not add holiness to our life, and yet this is being suggested or even taught on Sunday mornings, then we are indistinguishable from our "cultic" Christian neighbors. Being indistinguishable in the most basic teachings, may suggest that our conflict with them is a dead-letter. I will keep on re-reading your comment above, so that I can understand whether I've poorly communicated or else to really grasp your point. Thank you for sharing your thoughts.
Michele
Post a Comment